We should care about the minority, but they shouldn't dictate the defaults. They are a minority, IMO, the rest are fine with it. That's the majority of users of all software, and it's a developer's responsibility to understand that and take that into account. Not everyone has the knowledge or skill to be a developer or understand the inner workings of software, so they are simple users. One of the responsibilities of a developer is to think about their users. If you think part of your job is not educating users about the abilities of your software then you are living in some sort of a bubble. Whose problem is that? Certainly not the developers. without the label they look virtually the same to me (I notice there is some difference in colour but couldn't make the difference solely based on that same for (stalled) downloading/uploading - same icons with slightly different shade - IMHO quite difficult to distinguish and icons should serve as "quick visual clue"Įven though I'm on macOS, I kinda do like KDE's monocrhome/lines-only icons - maybe those could be used? Or use native icons available under the OS (CF Symbols under We're on the same side, but there's no need to be so rude. icons for move up/bottom / move to top/bottom seems inconsistent (thickness wise) icons for active/inactive/stalled are the same with colour to differentiate.it would be nice to be able to configure "use monochrome" for icons - IMHO they would look better.text on the torrent list could be just regular black (state expressed with status text + icon should be enough).Yeah, just got latest qB and while I admire will to improve the UI, I simply find it way to bright and colourful to the point where it's annoying to look at (and I'm somewhat colour-blind, sic!).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |